Azure Monitoring

 Log Analytics is an Azure service that collects and stores information/data from a set of different sources and we can use Log Analytics queries to retrieve records that match particular criteria, identify trends, analyze patterns, and provide a variety of insights into our data.  

Collect windows performance counters from Log Analytics agents at custom intervals to gain insight into the performance of hardware components, operating systems, and applications.

Implementation:

Step 1: Log in to Azure Portal.

Step 2: Access the Log Analytics Workspace >> Select your Log Analytics.

Step 3: After selecting the select Log Analytics Workspace, Navigate to Settings >> Agents Configuration.



Step 4: Select Windows Performance Counters >>You can start with the recommended performance counters by clicking on Add recommended counters or using the add button to add a new performance counter.



Step 5: Click on + Add Performance Counter >> Select the Performance Counter name


Step 5: After adding the required Performance Counter name, click on Apply to make the changes.


That’s it. You are done. At this point, we have successfully enabled Windows Performance Counters in Azure for Monitoring.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Different Types of Reports in Scrum - Agile

Image
  Introduction to Agile Reporting I’m not going to elaborate on the Agile Framework itself here.  1. Sprint Burndown At a Sprint-level, the burndown presents the  easiest way to track and report status  (the proverbial  Red / Amber / Green ), i.e., whether your Sprint is on or off-track, and what are the chances of meeting the Sprint goals. The burndown chart – when used right – can provide  near-real time updates  on Sprint progress. “If your team do it right, then they would take in just the right amount of work into a sprint.” At the beginning of a Sprint, the Scrum team perform Sprint Planning and agree to take on development work worth a certain number of Story points. This forms the basis for the Sprint Burndown chart. The total story points agreed at the beginning of the sprint make up the y-axis, and the individual dates in the Sprint make up x-axis. If your team do it right, then they would take in just the right amount of work into ...
Read more

Agile Retrospective

Image
  Guide to agile retrospectives for continuous improvement An agile retrospectives is an opportunity for agile development teams to reflect on past work together and identify ways to improve. Agile teams hold retrospective meetings after a time-boxed period of work is complete (typically a sprint lasting two to four weeks). During the agile retrospective, the team discusses what went well, what did not go as planned, and how to make the next work period better. Even if you are not on a development team, you can probably relate to the concept of retrospection. Have you ever worked hard on something only to realize later that you should have done it differently? It is not always a good feeling, but the solutions you uncover in hindsight can be valuable input for your next try. The same goes for your successes — acknowledging what went well and is worth repeating can be just as impactful. What is an agile retrospective? In short, an agile retrospective is a meeting...
Read more

Agile product management

Image
  What is agile product management? How do we define agile product management? It is a product development philosophy that emphasizes a flexible and human — rather than a rigid process- or tool-oriented — approach to defining product strategy and carrying out work. Teammates focus heavily on customer feedback to make improvements and adjust roadmaps throughout the product management process. This creates more responsive teams, leads to quicker iterations, and creates a more lovable experience overall. Benefits of agile product management Agile redefines how product managers think about planning and building products. Traditionally, new customer experiences were planned, designed, implemented, and tested in a step-by-step way. This meant that new functionality was delivered sequentially. Once requirements were defined and handed off to the development team, it was difficult to make any changes. The failure rate of large-scale and lengthy software development proj...
Read more